Soda Labs

Czechia

EU baseline, supervised by the central bank

JurisdictionEuropeConfidential with disclosure

Confidentiality is workable so long as the regulated firm can identify the parties and disclose on demand. Encrypted amounts are not the thing being restricted.

What Czechia actually says

Czechia is one of the member states that put crypto supervision inside the central bank rather than with a separate markets authority, which matters more for how firms experience the process than for what the rules say. On confidentiality it adds nothing to the European position: we located no Czech instrument restricting anonymity-enhancing assets or self-hosted wallets. The operative constraints are the ones described in the European entries in this section, and the practical question for anyone operating here is the authorisation process at the central bank rather than any distinctively Czech rule about how private a transaction may be.

The instruments that matter

The Czech National Bank is the competent authority
an arrangement shared with only a few member states, where the central bank rather than a separate markets regulator authorises crypto-asset service providers
The binding rules are European
identity travels with every transfer with no minimum value, and from 10 July 2027 regulated firms may not keep accounts that anonymise the holder
No national divergence located
we found no Czech instrument restricting anonymity-enhancing assets or transfers to self-hosted wallets

What this means for confidential transactions

Bubble is built for exactly this shape of obligation: amounts and balances live on chain as ciphertexts, computation happens without decryption, and the only disclosure path is an on-chain access list through which an authorized party - an auditor, a supervisor, a counterparty - can request scoped decryption. That is confidentiality from the public, not from the regulator.

Compliant by default.

See how selective disclosure satisfies a supervisor without publishing your book to the world.