The regime itself mandates, pilots or funds privacy-preserving technology.
What Wyoming actually says
Wyoming is the clearest example in the United States of a legislature building around self-custody rather than treating it as a gap. Classifying digital assets as property under the commercial code sounds technical and is not: it gives a holder a defined legal interest in an asset they control directly, rather than leaving the question to be answered by whoever holds it for them. Declining to require a money transmitter licence for standalone virtual currency keeps non-custodial activity outside the perimeter that elsewhere drags identity collection along with it. The state has since issued its own stable token, which makes it both regulator and issuer.
The instruments that matter
- Digital assets as property under the commercial code
- Wyoming was the first state to classify digital assets as intangible property under Article 9 of the Uniform Commercial Code, giving holders a defined legal interest rather than an undefined one
- No money transmitter licence for standalone virtual currency
- which keeps non-custodial activity outside the licensing perimeter that would otherwise pull identity collection with it
- A state-issued stable token
- the Frontier Stable Token launched in August 2025, reported as the first stablecoin issued by a US state, with reserve backing above par
What this means for confidential transactions
Bubble is built for exactly this shape of obligation: amounts and balances live on chain as ciphertexts, computation happens without decryption, and the only disclosure path is an on-chain access list through which an authorized party - an auditor, a supervisor, a counterparty - can request scoped decryption. That is confidentiality from the public, not from the regulator.
Related entries
- TexasAmericas · No licence for non-stablecoin crypto
- ArgentinaAmericas · Self-custody providers written out of the regime
- BahamasAmericas · Issuance of privacy tokens barred, trading not
- BermudaAmericas · A travel rule with no minimum, reaching self-hosted wallets
- BrazilAmericas · A named anonymity rule, and a CBDC that could not solve privacy
- British Virgin IslandsAmericas · Structural confidentiality kept, transactional confidentiality not
Compliant by default.
See how selective disclosure satisfies a supervisor without publishing your book to the world.