DFSA and ADGM FSRA
The regulators that went after the tools, not just the assets
A regulated firm must be able to attribute activity to an identified person, and assets or accounts that make that impossible are barred at the licensed perimeter. This is a rule about attribution, not about whether amounts are public.
What DFSA and ADGM FSRA actually says
The two financial free zones inside the UAE regulate separately from Dubai's virtual assets authority, and they went a step further than it did. Where most instruments in this section reach assets, the DIFC rulebook reaches the tool: it bars the use of a privacy device, meaning mixers and tumblers, in or from the zone. Abu Dhabi's regulator put the prohibition on privacy tokens into its rules in June 2025 and separately refuses simplified customer due diligence for virtual assets on the ground that clients and transactions are pseudonymous. Anyone structuring in the UAE is dealing with three distinct perimeters, not one.
The instruments that matter
- DFSA GEN 3A, in force 12 January 2026
- prohibits regulated activity in privacy tokens and bars the use of a privacy device, meaning mixers and tumblers, in or from the DIFC
- Firm-led token screening
- the DFSA abolished its list of recognised tokens, so firms must determine on a reasoned and documented basis whether each token meets the criteria
- ADGM FSRA amendments, 10 June 2025
- enshrine in rules the prohibition on using privacy tokens within ADGM, alongside a streamlined acceptance process for other assets
- No simplified due diligence
- the FSRA declines simplified customer due diligence for virtual asset activity, citing the pseudonymity of clients and transactions
What this means for confidential transactions
Bubble is built for exactly this shape of obligation: amounts and balances live on chain as ciphertexts, computation happens without decryption, and the only disclosure path is an on-chain access list through which an authorized party - an auditor, a supervisor, a counterparty - can request scoped decryption. That is confidentiality from the public, not from the regulator.
Related entries
- United Arab EmiratesMiddle East & Africa · The most explicit prohibition anywhere in this section
- MENAFATFMiddle East & Africa · The same machinery, across the Gulf and North Africa
- VARAMiddle East & Africa · The most explicit prohibition in any rulebook
- BahrainMiddle East & Africa · A listing test written against effects, not asset names
- EgyptMiddle East & Africa · Crypto barred, so data protection is the live constraint
- KenyaMiddle East & Africa · The ban written into primary legislation, not a rulebook
Compliant by default.
See how selective disclosure satisfies a supervisor without publishing your book to the world.